Dance Critique Essay Example for Free

Move Critique Essay In Fall 2012 there was a creation called Jubilation occurred in El Camino College in the Campus Theater. The Dance comprise of a wide range of styles of moving from African move by Nichole â€Å"Nittche† Thompson Spirit Within, to Tango as showed in La Revancha Del Tango, arranged by Imara Quinonez. One of the most widely recognized and best performed moves that was introduced in the creation were The Gift and Broadway Bound, arranged by Bernice Boseman. Broadway Bound comprised of twelve artists, and proceeded as a solitary gathering of young ladies, a solitary gathering of folks, and young ladies and folks moving together. In any case, in the presentation of The blessing there was only one person that played out his performance. As the well known tune of â€Å"The Little Drummer Boy† began, the lights show up in front of an audience concentrating on a kid who was perched on a stone with his drum. He was wearing a white free shirt with shorts and a red belt around him. The stage additionally had a white brilliant light in the back territory of the stage. As the melody began seven distinct characters came in individually with various shade of long dresses and had their heads fold over with long materials. As every artist came in strolling gradually bit by bit towards the brilliant back stage light, they raised the blessing up high and keep strolling gradually however this break the stage. After everybody had leave the stage the drummer kid got up from the stone and went to the brilliant light and raise his scrounge up high. At that point he start to move around to the beat of the drums around stage. Toward the start of the melody the initial seven artists who entered strolling had an over and again step strolling in a line. As they approach the stage they moved over the stage utilizing all the space from it. As they leave the drummer kid began moving. He was doing a performance move moving over the stage yet chiefly staying tin the center territory. The kid was doing diverse kind of jazz developments while grasping the present for the entire outstanding time. The work exhibited by the kid was streaming smooth all through the music and his move. Bernice Boseman was attempting to bring up the social piece of this move which she included a visual situation for us to comprehend the move in an alternate manner. By Bernice Boseman including the blessing transporters toward the start of the exhibition her goal is to make us see that the blessing bearers were rich individuals with an increasingly costly blessing attempting to offer them to god. This was spoken to by the huge splendid light toward the rear of the phase as god looking down on them. Despite what might be expected, the drummer kid was not as â€Å"good looking† as the rich blessing bearers and all he brought to the table god was only a drummer with his music. The drummer kid move to the tune communicating his emotions out for giving the blessing to god. He would go here and there extending his damages up and the cutting them down like on the off chance that he was having an idea for giving the blessing to him. He felt like if his blessing wasn’t as important as like the others. Toward the finish of the presentation he stooped down and raised his drum to god as a blessing. Generally, The Gift was an incredible presentation that made the crowd knew the creators purpose . The importance of the tune with the move was exceptionally clear and the drummer kid was extremely engaged in demonstrating us the manner in which he felt. In by and large, the association was effectively and were totally dedicated to the move.

Is the New SAT Harder 6 Challenging Changes

Is the New SAT Harder 6 Challenging Changes SAT/ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Noteworthy changes are going to the SAT in 2016, yet the impact they'll have on the understudy experience is begging to be proven wrong. Is the new SAT harder?It's difficult to tell without a doubt with no information on new score designs. Meanwhile, we can make a couple of expectations for how the progressions to the configuration and substance of the test could build its trouble. In this article, I'll give you an outline of the progressions to the test, show a few factors that may make it additionally testing, and recommend study systems for understudies who may battle on the new SAT. Diagram of Changes for the New SAT You should know some significant foundation data before we jump into the reasons the test may be more challenging.Here’s an outline of changes you can expect on the new SAT.For more subtleties, look at this article. Generally Format: The new SAT will be out of 1600 focuses rather than 2400 focuses. The Reading and Writing (which is presently called Writing and Language) areas will be packed into one segment worth 800 focuses (Math will in any case have its own segment). There will be four answer decisions for each question rather than five. There are just four areas in addition to the exposition, like the structure of the ACT (Reading, Writing and Language, Math with no adding machine, and Math with a number cruncher). Perusing: There will be no more sentence finish questions (all inquiries are section based)! A few inquiries will pose to you to distinguish printed proof for your responses to past inquiries. You'll see information understanding inquiries that will pose to you to understand outlines and charts that identify with the sections. Composing and Language: All inquiries will be founded on longer sections as opposed to singular sentences. Composing style (passage structure, making consistent contentions) will be a higher priority than it was on the old test. You'll see a couple of information translation inquiries on this area also. Paper: It's going to be discretionary! You'll get 50 minutes rather than 25 You should dissect a contention that you read in a section as opposed to composing a genuine belief based reaction to a brief. Your article score won’t sway your Reading and Writing score. Math: There will be some trigonometry on the test. A few issues will have more than one section. There's a no number cruncher segment. Questions will manage genuine situations all the more oftentimes, and there will be less â€Å"tricky† questions. Ooh such huge numbers of glossy new changes! For what reason Might It Be Harder? Here are a couple of reasons why I figure the new SAT could be more earnestly when all is said in done. You Can’t Memorize Vocabulary for Points One of the significant changes on the new SAT is that there are no more sentence finishing questions.The College Board is attempting to de-accentuate information on darken jargon words on the test.Many of these words are not pertinent to understudies after secondary school, and there have been claims that the old sentence consummation addresses favor wealthier students.On the new SAT, you will see jargon in setting questions as opposed to sentence culmination questions.These questions will allude to a word in the entry and request that you pick the appropriate response that speaks to its most exact definition given the specific situation. With this new configuration, remembering arrangements of SAT words won’t help you much.You’ll need to have solid in general perusing perception aptitudes to comprehend subtleties in the meanings of progressively normal words.It’s harder to read for these inquiries than it may be to read for sentence fruition questions in light of the fact that the abilities you need are typically gained after some time through autonomous perusing as opposed to by examining vocab cheat sheets. Domino Effect on Reading Questions Another new component on the Reading segment is the consideration of â€Å"find the evidence† questions.You’ll get an inquiry concerning a perusing section that expects you to make a derived conclusion.Then, the following inquiry will pose to you to pick the proof that you utilized for your answer.You’ll have a decision of four distinct statements from the entry. I portray this as a â€Å"domino effect† in such a case that you get the principal question wrong (or can’t settle on an answer), you’ll most likely get the subsequent one wrong too.Even on the off chance that you get the primary inquiry right, you probably won't have the option to pinpoint the statement that fits best as evidence.Since one inquiry depends on the other, it’s simple for things to get chaotic. I'm introducing this perspective on the circumstance since this article is about how the test may be more diligently. In any case, it's additionally conceivable that these sorts of inquiries will make things simpler for you. Seeing potential direct proof for your answer may commit you understand an error on the past inquiry and really help to improve your score. I believe all things considered, this will adjust the issue. Noooo thin bare Pillsbury Doughboy! What have you done?! Additional Reading Overall The new SAT includes much more perusing than the current (prospective old) SAT.All the Reading questions depend on passages.Even the Writing addresses will reference portions of entries instead of segregated sentences.The paper additionally includes all the more perusing in light of the fact that you’re requested to break down a contention made in an entry as opposed to simply perusing a short brief and reacting to it. Less Room for Subjectivity and Variation on the Essay The article is changing a ton on the new form of the test.Whereas before you needed to frame a supposition and make up your own models, presently you will be approached to break down an author’s contention. This will make for stricter reviewing measures and less adaptability in general.On the new article, there will be truly clear right and erroneous reactions. Information Interpretation Questions The new SAT will have charts on the Reading and Writing segments! The horror!This really isn’t so awful, yet it’s not quite the same as anything the College Board has done on the test in the past.These new sorts of inquiries could be mistaking or trying for certain understudies who aren’t happy with reaching determinations in this specific circumstance (or have maintained a strategic distance from the ACT due to the Science area!). Further developed Math and Writing Content Math issues will get somewhat more top to bottom with the incorporation of word issues that have more than one section in the matrix in section.Higher-level ideas will be tried, including a light sprinkling of essential trigonometry. The Writing area will likewise test a more extensive assortment of ideas that might be additionally testing. The old Writing segment basically centered around linguistic standards, though the new SAT Writing segment will pose more inquiries about elaborate decisions inside long passages.For model, inquiries will pose to you to figure out where a sentence has a place intelligently in a section. Fortunately, just Writing style matters on the new SAT, not fashion style. You can wear a burlap sack to the test though I couldn't care less (however I wouldn't suggest it; that stuff is distractingly irritated). Will It Be Harder for You? How Might You Prepare? It relies mostly upon what sort of understudy you are.I’ll experience a couple of various characteristics that may make understudies battle on the new test and give prep procedures to assist you with combatting these issues. Case #1: You Tend to Rely on Memorization Like I said in the past segment, retaining jargon words won’t help you much on the new SAT. On the off chance that you’re an extremely exceptional studier and were wanting to pro the Reading segment dependent on remembrance aptitudes, you may make them trouble.understanding significance in setting will be a basic expertise, so on-the-spot logical reasoning is a higher priority than recollecting the word reference meaning of â€Å"obsequious.† You should at present realize what docile methods, however, in light of the fact that it's a great word, and it depicts many individuals. Study Strategies: Practice with section based questions.The best solution for this issue is to get increasingly OK with responding to the sorts of inquiries that are hard for you.Although there are constrained practice assets for the new SAT, entry put together inquiries with respect to the old SAT will at present be useful to you for this reason. You can likewise work on perusing understanding in your day by day life.Set aside time each day to peruse two or three testing articles online.Learning through experience is the most effortless approach to fabricate better perusing appreciation aptitudes. Case #2: You’re a Slow Reader The new SAT will have far more perusing than the present variant, which implies that time issues are bound to happen.All inquiries in both the Reading and Writing parcels are dependent on entries instead of individual sentences.If you experienced difficulty with time on the Reading area before, the new test may wind up being harder. Study Strategies: Once more, I’d suggest saving more opportunity for autonomous reading.You can likewise attempt to develop your speed by taking practice tests.The key is to begin planning early with the goal that you have the opportunity to improve; perusing rapidly and completely is an ability that you won’t learn for the time being. You can likewise rehearse with the ACT English and Reading sections.ACT English is fundamentally the same as the new SAT Writing area in light of the fact that it’s all dependent on passages.It's a smart thought to look at certain methodologies for ACT English that will give you better approaches to move toward this new format.ACT Reading is truly not quite the same as SAT Reading as far as what the inquiries resemble, however on the off chance that you’re simply attempting to improve your understanding velocity, you should time yourself and attempt to finish the segment. Case #3: You’re Less Confident in Math and Science The new SAT will test somewhat further developed ideas in Math, and it will likewise incorporate a touch of information interpretation.If the Math segment is the most unnerving piece of th

The Department Of Homeland Security Act Example For Students

The Department Of Homeland Security Act At the point when one considers security, they will in general consider being ensured, liberated from damage or peril. There are different security dangers that the world faces today. Dangers could extend from a progression of digital dangers to psychological militant assaults. We are unendingly experienced with calamitous man-made and normal infections. The Department of Homeland Security quantifies the country s vulnerabilities, which means it steps up in driving and assessing vulnerabilities and planning with other government, state, nearby, and private elements to defend the best reaction. The formation of the country’s fifteenth Cabinet Department denoted the biggest rearrangement of government since the Truman organization. The Department of Homeland Security Act was made a year after September eleventh, 2001 to guarantee the insurance of the American outskirt and the individuals; additionally to quantify and screen counterterrorism. Since 2002, there have been six Secretaries of Homeland Security. The Secretary of Homeland Security can effect and shape the plan of how the United States of America executes and shields the different players that attempt to assault us. Secretary Michael Chertoff, when contrasted with the other five secretaries can be seen as somebody who had some hazy areas, yet effectively executed and changed the obligations of this position, which was looked for before him. His work and aptitude throughout the years as Secretary of Homeland Security through President Bush organization and the start of President Obama’s organization demonstrates his capacity to keep up proficient and stay focused on ensuring the American fringes and individuals. To completely comprehend the job of Security of Homeland Security, one should start to comprehend the association of this job. Country Security advanced from a government shout out or reacts to emergencies. After the September eleventh, psychological oppressor assaults in the United States unalterable changed the norm; since billions of dollars were being spent, a few laws were composed, strategies were created, manifestations of a few organizations; however individuals were looking towards the administration for direction. As indicated by the White House, the Department of Homeland Security was made to help the President in fortifying remote undertakings, fringe watch, and dangers against America through potential dangers, for example, the internet, misrepresentation, and fear based oppressor assaults. Congress detailed a report (officially known as the Homeland Security Act 2002), which built up the Department of Homeland Security, as an official division of the United States. Addi tionally, the strategic this office is to forestall fear monger assaults inside the United States. As per by O Hanlon , Orszag and et al (2002), the most significant and essential job of Congress was to make what is considered today to be the working association Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland Security was made through the reconciliation of twenty-two distinctive government divisions and offices into a brought together association (Chertoff, 2015). Lamentably, the technique that was best for this sort of employment is as followed: Acknowledging that while we should keep on concentrating on the steady and advancing fear monger danger, we additionally should perceive that certain non-psychological militant occasions that arrive at calamitous levels can have huge ramifications for country security. By making this office, it introduced a strengthened country security venture and America that is progressively ensured and better prepared to stand up to the dangers we face short or long haul. After, the disaster occasions of September eleventh, 2001, Thomas J. Edge a twice chosen Governor from Pennsylvania turned into the primary Assistant to the President for Homeland Security in 2001, in January 2003, turned into the principal Secretary of Homeland Security. As per Secretary Chertoff, in 2005 subsequent to being assigned by President Bush he was at that point set up taking a shot at country security matters. Secretary Chertoff was at that point required due to being accountable for the Criminal Division at the Department of Justice office. Secretary Chertoff was engaged with the underlying improvement of the counter fear based oppression procedure, after September eleventh. He felt that he had recognition with the issues that had surfaced and he accepted that, â€Å"This work was significant and I felt OK with the issues that were close by. Additionally, I felt that it would have been an energetic move for me to step down from being an appointed authority and assume the job of Secretary of Homeland Security.† (Chertoff, 2015). .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 , .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .postImageUrl , .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .focused content territory { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 , .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:hover , .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:visited , .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:active { border:0!important; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; mistiness: 1; progress: darkness 250ms; webkit-progress: murkiness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:active , .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:hover { obscurity: 1; progress: haziness 250ms; webkit-change: haziness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .focused content region { width: 100%; position: re lative; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .ctaText { fringe base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: striking; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content enrichment: underline; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; outskirt: none; fringe range: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: intense; line-stature: 26px; moz-fringe span: 3px; content adjust: focus; content enhancement: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-tallness: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/basic arrow.png)no-rehash; position: outright; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } .ub390529 63caff20206e86e39ca5729e6 .focused content { show: table; tallness: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .ub39052963caff20206e86e39ca5729e6:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: Everyone recalls Michael Jackson EssaySecretary Chertoff is frequently the individual that is continually or talking with media or the Council of Foreign Relations, or communicating what America needs to do so as to ensure wellbeing. Notwithstanding, to comprehend the job of Secretary Chertoff, one should initially comprehend Chertoff from an alternate point of view. He moved on from Childhood didn't shape his vocation. He grew up during the Cold-War time frame and diverse security condition. A long time as a Federal examiner and managed many sorted out cases including the Mafia. This imply he had the recognizable experience to research things. Affected him to In 2005, Secretary Chertoff united the twenty-two offices in to on one division with the Six-Point Agenda. The six-point Agenda was the establishment for executing approaches. This was Secretary Chertoff’s stamp to guarantee that the Department’s approaches, activities, and structure are adjusted and tended to in the most ideal manner with regards to both present and future potential dangers that face our country. This six-point motivation was intended to manage the division to changes in country security and will: 1) Increase by and large readiness, especially occasions, 2) Create better transpo use activity index to binding together the arranging and execution of the dept. wide activity. DOD joint tasks concerning military activities. Associations with the other National Security Council: Very great associations with different individuals. Secretary Rob Gates steady of zones and authority with country security issues. Worked close with the senior individuals Sec. Rice. Furthermore, the FB I and Justice dept. senior level easily among the different dept. shrub concentrated on sec. issues. Clear among authorities and caused it conceivable to better to get security and included. Ensuring that each on he cooperated. Gov. reaction Depends on the emergency and who the legislature has in that position that is willing out to complete those obligations. We have shown signs of improvement after some time managing emergencies since we have diverse experinces. In any case, this may not be the situation consistently in light of the fact that various emergencies need distinctive consideration. Model that was utilized was EBOLA. Practice and appropriate arranging. All things being equal, Emphasizing that as we secure the Homeland we can't just depend on guarded methodologies and all around arranged reaction and recuperation measures. We perceive that our endeavors additionally should include offense at home and abroad (Protecting the Homeland). Forestall and upset fear monger assaults. To forestall and upset psychological militant assaults in the United States, we are attempting to deny fear mongers and psychological oppressor related weapons and materials passage. Be that as it may, we should keep on reinforcing the establishment to guarantee our drawn out progress. To satisfy these duties over the long haul, we will keep on fortifying the standards, frameworks, structures, and establishments that cut over the country security venture and bolster our exercises to make sure about the Homeland. Be that as it may, this office won't in itself

How to Use the French Conditional (le Conditionnel)

The most effective method to Use the French Conditional (le Conditionnel) The French contingent (le conditionnel) mind-set is fundamentally the same as the English restrictive mind-set. It depicts occasions that are not ensured to happen, those that are frequently subject to specific conditions. While the French restrictive temperament has a full arrangement of conjugations, the English proportionate is just the modular action word would in addition to the fundamental action word. Le Conditionnel: If...then The French contingent is predominantly utilized inâ if...thenâ constructs. Itâ expresses the thought thatâ ifâ this were to happen,â thenâ that would be the result.â While French uses the wordâ siâ in the on the off chance that or condition provision, it doesn't utilize a term for then in the outcome clause. The contingent action word itself is utilized in the outcome (at that point) proviso, while just four different tenses are allowed in theâ siâ clause:â prã ©sent, pass㠩â composã ©, imparfait,â andâ plus-que-parfait. Il mangerait sil avait faim: He would eat in the event that he were hungrySi nous à ©tudiions, nous serions in addition to intelligents: If we contemplated, (at that point) we would be smarterIl mangerait avec nous si nous linvitions: He would eat with us in the event that we welcomed him Exceptional Cases: Vouloir and Aimer The action word vouloir (to want)â is utilized in the contingent to communicate an amenable solicitation: Je voudrais une pomme: I might want an appleJe voudrais y aller avec vous: I might want to go with you Be that as it may, you cannot state si vous voudriez to mean in the event that you might want, in light of the fact that the French contingent can never be utilized after si. The action word aimer (to like, love)â is used to communicate a respectful want, in some cases one that can't be satisfied: Jaimerais bien le voir: I might truly want to see itJaimerais y aller, mais je dois travailler: I might want to go, yet I need to work Conjugating le Conditionnel Conjugating the conditionalâ may be one of the least complex French conjugations youll experience. There is just one lot of endings for all action words. A large portion of them - even numerous that are unpredictable in the current state - utilize their infinitives as the root. There are just around two dozenâ stem-changingâ orâ irregular verbsâ that have sporadic restrictive stems however take similar endings. To give you how simple restrictive conjugations are, lets investigate how it applies to various sorts of action words. Well useâ jouerâ (to play) as our regularâ -erâ example,â finirâ (to finish) as our irregularâ -irâ example, andâ direâ (to state) as one special case to the principles. Subject Consummation Jouer Finir Desperate je - ais jouerais finirais dirais tu - ais jouerais finirais dirais il - ait jouerait finirait dirait nous - irons jouerions finirions dirions vous - iez joueriez finiriez diriez ils - aient joueraient finiraient diraient Notice how we needed to drop the e inâ direâ before including the contingent endings. This is the kind of progress you will discover in that bunch of action words that don't adhere to the standard restrictive conjugation design. Other than that, you can perceive that it is so natural to frame the contingent from practically any action word, even the unpredictable ones. The Verbs That Don't Follow the Rules So which action words are you must focus on with regards to the contingent action word mood? Dire and different action words that end inâ -ireâ are simple contrasted with a portion of the others, a couple of scarcely look like the infinitive structure while others take on increasingly unobtrusive changes.â The accompanying action words are sporadic in the contingent state of mind. Notice how the stems change and that they don't utilize the infinitive structure like different action words do. There are two principles here: The contingent stem consistently finishes in r. The identical action words are sporadic in theâ future tenseâ and utilize similar stems. While conjugating these into the restrictive, essentially join the endings noted above as per the subject pronoun in your sentence. Infinitive Verb Restrictive Stem Comparative Verbs acheter achã ¨ter- achever, amener, emmener, switch, promener acquã ©rir acquerr- conquã ©rir, s'enquã ©rir appeler appeller- à ©peler, rappeler, renouveler aller ir- avoir aur- courir courr- concourir, discourir, parcourir devoir devr- envoyer enverr- essayer essaier- balayer, effrayer, payer essuyer essuier- appuyer, ennuyer à ªtre ser- faire fer- falloir faudr- jeter jetter- feuilleter, hoqueter, projeter, rejeter nettoyer nettoier boss, noyer, tutoyer,- ayer stem-changing action words pleuvoir pleuvr- pouvoir pourr- savoir saur- tenir tiendr- maintenir, obtenir, soutenir valoir vaudr- venir viendr- devenir, parvenir, revenir voir verr- revoir vouloir voudr-

Helping You Write a Term Paper

Helping You Write a Term PaperWriting term papers is a tedious job. To help you out, here are some tips on how to write a term paper, plus a few helpful tools for you to take advantage of. I'll go over the actual task of writing a term paper and then go over some tips for using the various tools I mentioned before.When you're writing a term paper, make sure you dedicate some time to getting everything down, including footnotes. It may be useful to draw up some rough draft on paper. A few people say that you can't really draw a term paper up at first; it has to feel like the finished product.Start writing the actual paper before you're even done with the actual term paper. It doesn't matter how good you think you are, if you're not on a deadline you might lose your focus. If you can spend a few minutes taking notes and doing research before you begin writing, you'll have the feeling of finishing and will be more motivated to finish it before you have a deadline.Writing as you read is an effective method of keeping yourself focused and motivated. After you've finished your research, write out the questions that you didn't fully understand, followed by a short summary of the problems and how they pertain to the rest of the paper. Make sure you include a conclusion at the end of the paper, as well.If you're going to take a full-length class on a topic, make sure you read through your term paper in its entirety. Read every single page of it and use it as a reference while you're writing. Reading it in its entirety will help you keep your focus on the material rather than having to stop and reread lines of text and other things that might bog you down.The next tip, I'll talk about is that you should always edit your term paper as you go. Sometimes, the ideas that you have will catch you off guard, or you might feel that a certain part needs to be clarified. Don't just let your term paper sit there with nothing changed, if you feel it needs to be changed it's best to make that change.The last tip I'll mention is that you should have a meeting with yourself to discuss your term paper. At this point, you can ask yourself certain questions and figure out if you need to edit the paper. Then, when you've completed your term paper, go back and read the whole thing again.To sum up, writing a term paper is hard work. Use these tips to help get you started and have the best experience possible. Good luck!

Persuasion Credulity in Institutional Conflicts - Literature Essay Samples

Theatre has always been an outlet for the articulation of opinion and the careful expression of controversial or uncomfortable topics. It may be easy to forget in this current age of trigger warnings and hypersensitivity, but some of the theatre’s many roles in society are to provoke thought, to discuss relevant subject matter, and to explore what it means to be human. Two examples of plays that unashamedly succeed in fulfilling these roles are Oleanna (written in 1992 by David Mamet) and Doubt: A Parable (written in 2005 by John Patrick Shanley). Both deal with controversial themes—sexual exploitation and pedophilia—and are focused on conveying the power struggles between opposing forces. In the former, it is between a well-meaning college professor and a manipulative political activist group; in the latter, it is between the head of a patriarchal religious system and a female principal with societal limitations. The institutional forces present in these two plays are so strong that—in an attempt to vie for support in the intellectual battle—they are able to bend certain weaker-minded characters to their will with relative ease. One character in each work of drama gets caught up in the middle of the struggle between two incompatible ideologies, and is used as a tool by the author to indicate the severity of the conflict. It is Carol in Oleanna and Sister James in Doubt—who, throughout their character arcs, flip back and forth between the opposing ideas presented to them. In essence, both Carol and Sister James fall victim to the powerful compulsions of their respective institutions and, as evidenced by their intellectual inconsistencies throughout the two plays, are ultimately unable to think critically for themselves or seize any real authority of their own. In 1992, playwright David Mamet puts to use a minimalistic style (in both cast size and scenic conceptualization) to pose the question, â€Å"How dangerous is political correctness?† His play Oleanna depicts Carol, a struggling college student totally lacking in power over her education, who turns to manipulation and deceit in order to take vengeance upon perceived wrongs committed by her professor, John. She begins the play in John’s office discussing her inability to succeed in her class with John and, after finding their recurrent meetings fruitless, she joins a political activist group on campus. This group encourages her to accuse him of sexual harassment and threaten to charge him with rape if he does not meet her demands. In the furious final moments of the play, John loses his temper and assaults Carol. A modern-day, progressive reading of Oleanna may lead the reader to sympathize with Carol and read John’s actions as atrocious; however, as it is likely the author’s intention to vilify Carol’s manipulation and portray John’s aggressive Act-III actions as justified, I will, for the purposes of this essay, contend with Mamet’s original intent. It stands to reason, then, that John is the sympathetic character and the one meant to be the play’s protagonist. Therefore, despite the fact that the group Carol mentions joining nor its members ever make a physical appearance in the play, I would argue that the activist group is the play’s true antagonist. It is first introduced in Act I that Carol has trouble understanding concepts and it is hinted at that she perhaps isn’t so intelligent. When she and John are discussing his class lectures, she says, â€Å"I’m doing what I’m told. It’s difficult for me. It’s difficult . . .† (Mamet 6). Then, a few pages later: â€Å"I don’t understand. I don’t understand what anything means . . . and I walk around. From morning ’til night: with this one thought in my head. I’m stupid† (12). It is crucial to note that it is her herself admitting these things, even despite John’s statements to the contrary: â€Å"You’re an incredibly bright girl . . . You’re an incredibly . . . you have no problem with the . . . Who’s kidding who?† (7). It is clear here that Carol has poor study habits and is doing poorly in class due to her inability to comprehend certain concepts. It is also suggested several times that she lacks the skill to effectively articulate herself. When she asks for clarification on a certain topic discussed in class, she pulls out her notes in reference. John then says, â€Å"Tell me in your own . . .† but she insists, because she wants to â€Å"make sure that [she has] it right† (27). Later in the conversation as well, she begins to take notes on what he is saying. â€Å"You don’t have to take notes, you know,† John says, â€Å"you can just listen† (34). She again maintains that it’s the only way she can remember the information. This dialogue is important, as it furthermore mirrors her behavior in the second half of the play as well. At the beginning of Act II, John is reading the report she submitted to the tenure committee: Carol: Then you . . . [Points] John: â€Å"Consult the report†? Carol: . . . that’s right. John: You see. You see. Can’t you . . . You see what I’m saying? Can’t you tell me in your own words? Carol: Those are my own words (49). Even when Carol is asserting herself, making an attempted appeal for power, it is ironically still communicated through the voice of another—as there is little doubt that the entire report was conceived by her â€Å"group† as a means to further its agenda. Therefore, it stands to reason that after she joins the group, she merely becomes their puppet as opposed to John’s—leaving her still, even in her moment of apparent victory, powerless. After viewing John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt: A Parable, an audience member is meant to be unsure of who or what to believe. It tells the story of a priest in 1964 who may be molesting a Catholic school student and the principal who is convinced of his guilt—and intent on proving it. It is written in such a way that no definitive answer is supplied; therefore, it is likely the intention of the playwright that viewers leave the theatre intellectually divided—or, at the very least, compelled to discuss the events they just saw unfold. As the title suggests, uncertainty is a key thematic element of this play. The character that best represents these ideas in human form is Sister James, one of the school’s teachers and Sister Aloysius’s subordinate. A dramatic foil to Father Flynn’s and the principal’s unwavering confidence and determination, Sister James is malleable, naà ¯ve, and credulous. Sister Aloysius even says it directly in the second scene: â€Å"You are a very innocent person, Sister James† (Shanley 8). Much like Mamet’s Carol, none of the statements she makes seem to come from her own mind; she always makes an assertion or sides with another character immediately following a particular piece of persuasive rhetoric. A subtle example can be found in Scene 2, when Sister Aloysius warns her not to show so much interest in history because it might sway the students to value it above the other subjects. Sister James responds, â€Å"I never thought of that. I’ll try to treat my other lessons with more enthusiasm† (10)—which establishes her automatically obsequious nature. Sister James is completely under her command throughout the play; this explains why she accepts the idea that Flynn might be behaving inappropriately with Donald Muller without much critical thought. As soon as Aloysius expresses her own reservations, James finds suspicions in the one-on-one talk Flynn had with Donald in the rectory—suspicions she didn’t have until this moment: â€Å"I didn’t think there was anything wrong with it. It never came into my mind that he . . . that there could be anything wrong† (21). When this behavior is compared to her dialogue with Father Flynn later in the play, it becomes clear that Sister James assumes a similar demeanor when presented with a strong argument from the other side as well. When she inquires if his sermon about gossip was directed at anyone in particular, he responds â€Å"What do you think?† She immediately changes the subject, asking instead about whether or not he made up the parable of the feather pillow (38). He soon comes back around, however, asking if she is convinced of his guilt. The following occurs: Sister James: It’s not for me to be convinced, one way or another. It’s Sister Aloysius. Flynn: Are you just an extension of her? Sister James: She’s my superior. Flynn: But what about you? Sister James: I wish I knew nothing whatever about it (39). These two exchanges demonstrate that even when questioned directly and encouraged to think for herself, she would rather avoid the issue and instead allow others’ opinions to influence her. It happens later in that very scene. Father Flynn waxes poetic about love, humanity, and how the â€Å"light in your heart† is not a weakness—essentially manipulating what he knows are her values to make a pathos appeal. She then confides that he is right, that Sister Aloysius has taken away her â€Å"joy of teaching† and that the principal is not a positive inspiration (41). She leaves the stage, but not before exclaiming â€Å"I don’t believe it!† (42). It is at this point that she is completely under Flynn’s spell, and the audience realizes James is merely a pawn to be moved to and fro. The Failure to Resist Persuasion: The key stylistic difference between these two plays is the portrayal of innocence versus guilt. While Oleanna is clearly written as more of a one-sided debate than that of Doubt (i.e., the audience is meant to side with John unwaveringly while the guilt of Father Flynn is more ambiguous), both of these plays are effective in conveying a character’s inability to resist the persuasive voices of opposing ideologies. The authority figures in Oleanna and Doubt are strong-willed and self-assured, which ultimately proves too much for Carol and Sister James; in the end, neither of these two characters are able to conceptualize and act upon an original thought. Each and every actionable step they take as their stories progress is at the whim of another character—whether they be present in the play like John and Father Flynn or merely mentioned like Carol’s progressive political group. While the primary focus of the plays may be to preach of the dangers of extreme progres sivism and to demonstrate the limitations a nun faces in the Catholic Church, Mamet and Shanley also include the consequences of blind obeisance and subtly advocate the merits of critical thinking—despite strong institutional compulsions. Works Cited: Shanley, John Patrick. Doubt: A Parable. Theatre Communications Group, 2004. Mamet, David. Oleanna. Vintage Books, 1992.

Walt Disney A Visionary And Ethical Leader - 1685 Words

Walt Disney Walt Disney once said, â€Å"It’s not the magic that makes it work, it’s the work that makes the magic.† (Capodagli Jackson, 2007). Walt Disney was truly a visionary and ethical leader that used his talents as a transformational leader and artist to dream up a world that has stood the test of time for nearly 90 years. In this paper I will explain why he was both a visionary and ethical leader. It will show that he used inspirational motivation and intellectual stimulation to further his clear and easy to follow vision, inspire his personnel, and leverage their creativity. It will also show why I believe Walt Disney fit into the traits of an ethical leader by valuing his team members and creating an environment of mutual trust and respect. Then I will tell you how I have used the same transformational leadership behaviors to lead my people, have made sure not to fall into an ethical trap and take credit for the work others do. All leaders could learn something from Walt’s visionary leadership. Visionary Leader Walt Disney was a visionary and transformational leader that used Inspirational Motivation and Intellectual Stimulation and an easy to follow vision that inspired his people to achieve their shared dream of providing the best family entertainment possible. Walt Disney’s vision was clear, simple, and easy to follow. Dream, Believe, Dare, Do. (Capodagli Jackson, 2007). He spoke so passionately about his dreams that others around him couldn’t help butShow MoreRelatedWalt Disney : A Visionary And Ethical Leader1948 Words   |  8 Pageshappiest place on earth? Well Walt Disney did just that. He had a vision to build the cleanest and friendliest amusement park on earth. The purpose of this essay is to define and outline specific rationale on why Walt Disney was both a visionary and ethical leader. I will expand on why Walt Disney was a visionary leader by using his inspirational behavior to remove waste from his amusement park. I will also explain how he was an ethical leader by using ethical behavior to educate children throughRead MoreWalt Disney : A Visionary Leader Essay1701 Words   |  7 PagesWalt Disney When people think about Walt Disney they will most likely think about Disneyland, Disneyworld, or even Mickey Mouse. What people do not realize is that he started with an advertisement company and built one of the most widely recognizable companies in the world. Walt Disney was a great in his visionary leadership, but he was not effective in his ethical leadership. Disney inspired his company to achieve his dream, but he was an egoistic leader during the process. This paperRead MoreSynthesis Essay : Walt Disney1769 Words   |  8 Pages Synthesis Essay: Walt Disney MSgt Darrell W. Lanus Air Force Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy September 10, 2014 Instructor: MSgt Anthony Sansone â€Æ' Walt Disney Imagine yourself as one person trying to totally reinvent the way that families are entertained. I will be talking to you about a farmer that became an animator. A farmer as a visionary leader, impressive. That is the story of Walt Disney. By all rights, Walt Disney was an excellent animator, but he had the self-awarenessRead MoreWalt Disney s Leadership Qualities1412 Words   |  6 Pagescome. As a man sat in front of an easel, bursting with excitement, the pencil hitting the paper began to emulate the imagination of the exquisite Walt Disney. Although, the journey to success was changing and overwhelming, at times. Walt Disney’s legacy has sustained to be held in high regard by many people today in leadership positions. Thus, Mr. Disney had animating jobs before developing his company, which revolved around the infamous Mickey Mouse, he was even forced back into animation afterRead MoreA Leading Global Organization Called Walt Disney2093 Words   |  9 Pages This essay is based on a leading global organisation called Walt Disney. The essay will cover issues in areas of, the organisations ‘shared responsibilities’ managing a world view, education and training, equality and diversity, managing employment in a complex international setting. The essay will make full use of theory and evidence to explore these issues in the context of the organisation, together with its employees, customer and stakeholders, and the interrelationship with the host destinationRead MoreCase Studies of Business Ethics Corporate Governance3354 Words   |  14 Pagestaken by the multinational corporation, host government, and other stakeholders following the disaster.  » Understand why this tragedy and the outcome reflect the dark side of contemporary capitalism.  » Understand the transnational aspects of the ethical debate and how multinational corporations can be held accountable for its malpractices in a country other than its origin. BUSINESS ETHICS: COCA-COLA FACES ANOTHER UNIVERSITY BAN The article discusses about the ban on coca cola by UniversityRead MoreThe Walt Disney Company Report15335 Words   |  62 PagesCompany Research Paper The Walt Disney Company Pranay Kumar George Batah Shuxian Shen Sheng Hao Koo â€Å"We have complied with university honor code in completion of this assignment and I attest that this work is ours and ours alone.† Professor Suzanne Weiss Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Company Background 3. Management 4. Situation Analysis 5. Ethics and Responsibility 6. Human Resource 7. Globalization 8. Operation and Production Read MoreCurrent Ceo Of Hewlett Packard ( Hp ) Company1994 Words   |  8 Pagesdiploma from Harvard School of Business. From that she became one of the planet’s most successful CEO and powerful leader. Prior to HP Meg held CEO and leading management positions in many large companies as follow: Hasbro Inc. Preschool Division as a General Manager, Florist Transworld Delivery as President CEO, Stride Rite Corporation as President of Stride Rite Division, Walt Disney Company as Senior VP in Marketing, Bain Company as VP, Procter Gamble as VP Brand Management, and CEO of eBayRead MoreLeadership And Its Impact On Business2141 Words   |  9 Pagesisn’t a definitive authority on how to be a later. One thing is for certain, while excellent leaders may or may not improve a business, poor ethics and a lack of morality in business tends to have disastrous consequences. â€Æ' Leaders in business are an important commodity. Why do some succeed and some fail? Some of it seems to just be luck of where they tend to take over in the business cycle. Some leaders seem to have a magical touch and create success no matter where they go. There are others whoRead MoreBook Review Built to Last4076 Words   |  17 Pagesand Porras try to answer. They took a look at 18 well known, well established and healthy companies (visionaries), and compared them to a counterpart in their specific area of business. They analyzed all the information they could get their hands on, compiled it, and looked at it to try to find patterns both between the visionary companies and their counterparts, as well as among the visionary companies themselves. The result of all of this is a set of guidelines and principles that all companies